InTheNameOfJesus
05/16/2020, 07:37:33
Author Profile | Edit
|
Has been released. (<-- link)
Here is the updated “state of the noosphere” (percentage of global high-quality scientific research produced by country, as proxied by the Nature Index FC).
|
Country |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
pc12/19 |
1 |
USA |
37.15% |
36.49% |
34.88% |
35.00% |
34.57% |
34.10% |
32.87% |
31.40% |
-2.4% |
2 |
China |
8.95% |
10.21% |
11.97% |
12.91% |
13.97% |
15.83% |
18.49% |
21.14% |
12.3% |
3 |
Germany |
8.00% |
8.00% |
7.85% |
7.84% |
7.76% |
7.60% |
7.37% |
7.08% |
-1.7% |
4 |
UK |
6.45% |
6.43% |
6.35% |
6.49% |
6.55% |
6.28% |
6.03% |
5.88% |
-1.3% |
5 |
Japan |
6.83% |
6.60% |
6.24% |
5.74% |
5.48% |
5.32% |
4.93% |
4.71% |
-5.3% |
6 |
France |
4.63% |
4.39% |
4.33% |
4.09% |
4.00% |
3.76% |
3.54% |
3.49% |
-4.0% |
7 |
Canada |
3.02% |
2.91% |
2.91% |
3.00% |
2.73% |
2.69% |
2.62% |
2.50% |
-2.7% |
8 |
Switzerland |
2.33% |
2.29% |
2.51% |
2.27% |
2.33% |
2.30% |
2.26% |
2.32% |
0.0% |
9 |
South Korea |
2.35% |
2.26% |
2.29% |
2.39% |
2.30% |
2.23% |
2.19% |
2.24% |
-0.7% |
11 |
Australia |
1.70% |
1.84% |
1.86% |
2.05% |
2.03% |
1.85% |
2.04% |
1.96% |
2.1% |
10 |
Spain |
2.37% |
2.31% |
2.13% |
2.01% |
2.08% |
1.87% |
1.87% |
1.81% |
-3.9% |
13 |
India |
1.45% |
1.67% |
1.82% |
1.60% |
1.57% |
1.67% |
1.55% |
1.62% |
1.6% |
12 |
Italy |
2.14% |
2.12% |
2.04% |
2.00% |
1.81% |
1.76% |
1.65% |
1.60% |
-4.1% |
14 |
Netherlands |
1.52% |
1.49% |
1.48% |
1.45% |
1.61% |
1.55% |
1.50% |
1.45% |
-0.7% |
16 |
Sweden |
0.94% |
0.97% |
1.00% |
1.11% |
1.01% |
1.03% |
1.01% |
0.97% |
0.5% |
17 |
Israel |
1.03% |
0.93% |
0.96% |
1.03% |
1.03% |
1.01% |
0.98% |
0.95% |
-1.2% |
15 |
Singapore |
0.92% |
0.95% |
1.02% |
0.99% |
0.95% |
1.04% |
0.98% |
0.95% |
0.4% |
19 |
Russia |
0.59% |
0.68% |
0.72% |
0.65% |
0.69% |
0.70% |
0.75% |
0.73% |
2.9% |
20 |
Belgium |
0.69% |
0.64% |
0.68% |
0.70% |
0.78% |
0.68% |
0.66% |
0.64% |
-1.0% |
22 |
Denmark |
0.59% |
0.58% |
0.62% |
0.63% |
0.69% |
0.62% |
0.66% |
0.60% |
0.2% |
18 |
Taiwan |
1.18% |
1.06% |
0.95% |
0.84% |
0.77% |
0.73% |
0.63% |
0.58% |
-10.1% |
21 |
Austria |
0.53% |
0.55% |
0.62% |
0.54% |
0.58% |
0.64% |
0.59% |
0.57% |
1.0% |
23 |
Brazil |
0.39% |
0.46% |
0.46% |
0.40% |
0.44% |
0.45% |
0.49% |
0.44% |
1.4% |
24 |
Poland |
0.35% |
0.42% |
0.41% |
0.42% |
0.36% |
0.38% |
0.38% |
0.39% |
1.5% |
25 |
Czechia |
0.23% |
0.23% |
0.24% |
0.27% |
0.30% |
0.33% |
0.32% |
0.36% |
6.1% |
There’s no major change to existing trends:
-
Slow decline of the West (on average -2.0% per annum since 2012), at about the same rate in both the US (-2.4%) and the EU-28 (-1.9%). Even so, the “West” still accounts for 65% of the world total, if down from 74% in 2012.
-
Within the West, broadly speaking, Switzerland (its 8 million people accounting for a stunning ~2.3% of science production), the Scandinavians, Western Offshoots (Australia, Canada), and the EU-13 are keeping their share steady, while the Med is plummeting at ~4% per annum.
-
East Asia increases its share from 13% to 25%, of which more than 100% is accounted for by China.
-
As expected, China continues soaring (12% per annum since 2012), increasing its share from 9% to 21%. We can expect this to continue in light of China’s still unrealized potential and perhaps the greater freedom of inquire it offers its scientists relative to the increasingly SJW-ridden West (e.g. see this excellent essay by Wael Taji Miller).
-
No major changes elsewhere: In terms of share of global science production, India remains stuck at ~1.6%, Latin America at 1.0%, Dar al-Islam at 0.7%, and Russia and the V4 countries at ~0.7% each.
-
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding South Africa) has shown strong growth since 2015, increasing from 0.05% of world science production to 0.08% – a rate of increase similar to China. But, that’s only four years – and from an almost imperceptibly low base.
-
As I wrote in another recent article on The Nature Index, even within the northern core that produces ~95% of global elite-level science, just a few dozen cities/institutions account for the overwhelming bulk of it.
I don’t really have anything add to my existing analysis at The Geography of the Noosphere. Just an update that the data continues to back up its general conclusions – namely, (1) no “ice people” = no more science progress, and (2) Sinotriumph, so far as trends in global distribution of science production go.
|